Home / Tin tức / ex 4 Ex 4 10/05/2022 discrete-ucozfree.comematics proof-writing induction nói qua Cite Follow edited Jan 7, năm ngoái at 19:55 6005 44k88 gold badges6868 silver badges157157 bronze badges asked Feb 2, 2013 at 13:08 AndrewAndrew 8522 gold badges22 silver badges55 bronze badges $endgroup$ 2 địa chỉ cửa hàng a comment | 2 Answers 2 Sorted by: Reset to mặc định Highest score (default) Date modified (newest first) Date created (oldest first) 4 $egingroup$ Your proof is fine, but you should show clearly how you got khổng lồ the last expression.Bạn đang xem: Ex 4$dfrack(k+1)(k+2)3+(k+1)(k+2)$$=dfrack3(k+1)(k+2)+(k+1)(k+2)$$=(dfrack3+1)(k+1)(k+2)$$=dfrack+33(k+1)(k+2)$$=dfrac(k+1)(k+2)(k+3)3$.You should also word your proof clearly. For example, you can say "Let $P(n)$ be the statement ... $P(1)$ is true ... Assume $P(k)$ is true for some positive integer $k$ ... Then $P(k+1)$ is true ... Hence $P(n)$ is true for all positive integers $n$". giới thiệu Cite Follow edited Feb 2, 2013 at 16:55 Michael Hardy 1 answered Feb 2, 2013 at 13:15 user4594user4594 $endgroup$ 2 địa chỉ cửa hàng a phản hồi | 0 $egingroup$ It might also be helpful to lớn go backwards to lớn see that it makes sense. Specifically, $$S_n+1 - S_n = frac(n+2)(n+1)(n)3 - frac(n+1)(n)(n-2)3 = frac13left(n^3 + 3n^2 + 2n - n^3 + n ight) = n(n+1)$$Going backwards, you can more easily see that $$S_n+1 = S_n + n(n+1)$$ tóm tắt Cite Follow answered Mar 3, 2018 at 22:18 kaiwenwkaiwenw 4144 bronze badges $endgroup$ showroom a bình luận | Your Answer Thanks for contributing an answer to lớn ucozfree.comematics Stack Exchange!Please be sure to lớn answer the question. Provide details & share your research!But avoid …Asking for help, clarification, or responding lớn other answers.Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.Xem thêm: Mẫu Đăng Ký Người Phụ Thuộc Giảm Trừ Gia Cảnh Qua Mạng 2021, Tờ Khai Đăng Ký Người Phụ Thuộc Giảm Trừ Gia CảnhUse ucozfree.comJax khổng lồ format equations. ucozfree.comJax reference.To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. Draft savedDraft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using thư điện tử and Password Submit Post as a guest Name thư điện tử Required, but never shown Post as a guest Name e-mail Required, but never shown Post Your Answer Discard By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to lớn our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged discrete-ucozfree.comematics proof-writing induction or ask your own question. Linked7computing $A_2=sum_k=1^nfrac1(z_k-1)^2 $ & $sum_k=1^n cot^2left( frackpin+1 ight)$2Bertrand's Box Paradox Generalized Related 4 Proving by induction that $| x_1 + x_2 + ... + x_n | leq | x_1 | + | x_2| + ... + | x_n |$ 0 Proof by induction; simplify when adding k+1th term. Understanding induction. 2 Prove by induction that $sum_i=0^n left(frac 3 2 ight)^i = 2left(frac 3 2 ight)^n+1 -2$ 1 Induction Proof using factorials 2 Proving that $3 + 3 imes 5 + 3 imes 5^2 + cdots+ 3 imes 5^n = <3(5^n+1 - 1)> / 4$ whenever $n geq 0$ 0 Induction to prove $a_n=2^n+1$ 1 Proving $sum_i=1^n (1-frac1(i+1)^2) = fracn+22n+2$ using induction. 0 Proving $6n^4>(n+2)^4$ for $ngeq 4$, by induction Hot Network Questions more hot questions Question feed Subscribe to RSS Question feed khổng lồ subscribe lớn this RSS feed, copy & paste this URL into your RSS reader. ucozfree.comematics Company Stack Exchange Network Site kiến thiết / hình ảnh sản phẩm © 2022 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. Rev2022.5.9.42071 Your privacy By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device & disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy.